One year on from the accident industry leaders provided their perspectives on Fukushima and outlined what steps their companies were taking in response.
Frank Yee Chief Nuclear Engineer
"Simply put, the first videos of the tsunami rolling over the coastal regions were shocking. It was difficult to comprehend the scale and magnitude of the destruction and loss of life.
The subsequent accident at Fukushima raised many questions in our minds. Was this preventable? As designers, we design for these types of events, so what was missed? What can we learn from this so that it does not happen again?" (more)
Aris Candris President and CEO
"Fukushima has reinforced the need to further prepare for the unexpected. It is imperative to assess and, where necessary, incorporate significant new information as it becomes available.
As is our nature and practice, we will incorporate any lessons learned across the industry as the first step in a short-term and long-term review of enhancements that may be made at all nuclear facilities in the aftermath of the events in Japan." (more)
Michel-Hubert Jamard Senior Executive Vice President Communications
"The accident has raised legitimate questions and the nuclear industry has to give appropriate answers. The debate on nuclear power is a legitimate one: and we will take part in it. AREVA is open to dialogue and debate.
More than ever, we will listen and educate in order to maintain and restore the trust we were able to build with all of our stakeholders." (more)
Caroline Reda President and CEO
"The nuclear industry is, first and foremost, characterized by a strong commitment to cooperation and safety. The lessons learned from the events in Japan are going to make the industry safer and we’re committed to being part of the analysis, learning and evolution of the industry." (more)
Jong-Shin Kim President and CEO
"The global demand for energy is continuously on the rise and greenhouse gases generated from burning fossil fuels is still troubling the earth. Alternative energy should be environment-friendly; ensuring a sustainable supply of low-cost and high-efficiency energy. Thus, I think nuclear energy is still the most viable alternative." (more)
Vyacheslav Pershukov Deputy Director General, Direction of Science and Technology
"After the accident in Japan, absolutely all work relating to the safety analysis of research reactors were subject to rigorous scrutiny."(more)
(note: company affiliations and positions as of March 2012)
WNN has been reporting on developments at the Fukushima site and the global response to the accident since March 11, 2011.
Click here for the most recent WNN articles on the Fukushima accident and response.
Click here to search for all Fukushima articles on WNN.
The WNA Fukushima Accident Information Paper describes in detail the events of the accident and subsequent work to achieve a cold shutdown condition, treat contaminated water and minimise releases of radioactive materials.
An overview of current situation at Fukushima, the effects on people and the environment and the actions now being taken at the Fukushima site. Click here for more.
In 2012 WNA released a video where radiation experts from the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation
(UNSCEAR), the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and the Chernobyl Tissue Bank discuss the effects of
radiation from a nuclear accident. Click here to view the video
Blog | Gallery | eShop | Nuclear Energy Index | Contact us
© 2013 World Nuclear Association, registered in England and Wales, number 01215741.
Registered office: 22a St James's Square London SW1Y 4JH United Kingdom