Radioactive Waste Repository & Store for Australia
(Updated November 2016)
- Australia has a relatively small amount of low-level radioactive waste and rather less volume of intermediate-level waste.
- Six volunteered sites have been shortlisted for a national repository for both categories of wastes, and one site provisionally selected from these.
While Australia has no nuclear power producing electricity, it does have well-developed usage of radioisotopes in medicine, research and industry. Many of these isotopes are produced in the research reactor at Lucas Heights, near Sydney, then used at hospitals, industrial sites and laboratories around the country.
Each year Australia produces about 45 cubic metres of radioactive wastes arising from these uses and from the manufacture of the isotopes – about 40 m³ low-level wastes (LLW) and 5 m³ intermediate-level wastes (ILW). This LLW is now stored at over a hundred sites around Australia. This is not considered a suitable long-term situation. Early in 2015 the government said there were 4248 m³ of LLW awaiting disposal and 656 m³ of ILW awaiting better storage. Two containers – about 25 tonnes – of ILW from reprocessing ANSTO research reactor fuel in France arrived in December 2015.
Since the late 1970s there was an evolving process of site selection for a national radioactive waste repository for LLW and short-lived ILW. There was also consideration of the need to locate a secure storage facility for long-lived intermediate-level wastes including those which will be returned to Australia following the reprocessing of used fuel from Lucas Heights.
There is one LLW repository, the Mt Walton East Intractable Waste Disposal Facility, about 480 km northeast of Perth, and managed by a division of the WA Department of Finance. It is solely for Western Australia’s LLW.
In other countries vastly more such waste is produced. Around the world, nuclear power generation produces over 150,000 cubic metres of low and intermediate-level wastes each year, and the extensive use of radioisotopes in medicine and industry would add to this. The UK and France each produce about 25,000 cubic metres of LLW annually.
LLW and short-lived ILW are disposed of in various ways, mostly in shallow burial. They are often incinerated or compacted first, to reduce their volume. Near-surface disposal of such wastes has been going on in about 70 facilities in several countries for over 35 years. A further 30 repositories are expected to open in the next few years.
|Classification of radioactive wastes
There are several systems of nomenclature in use, but the following is generally accepted:
- Exempt waste – excluded from regulatory control because radiological hazards are negligible.
- Low-level waste (LLW) – contains enough radioactive material to require action for the protection of people, but not so much that it requires shielding in handling or storage.
- Intermediate-level waste (ILW) – requires shielding. If it has more than 4000 Bq/g of long-lived (over 30 year half-life) alpha emitters it is categorised as 'long-lived ILW' – category S – and requires more sophisticated handling and disposal.
- High-level waste (HLW) – sufficiently radioactive to require both shielding and cooling, generates >2 kW/m³ of heat and has a high level of long-lived alpha-emitting isotopes.
In Commonwealth government documents, low-level wastes are 'category A', short-lived ILW are 'category B' if amenable to embedding in concrete prior to disposal, or 'category C' if bulk material. Both require at least 5 metres of cover. Long-lived ILW are 'category S'.
Repositories are often located in populated areas and farming areas. France's main repository (for 1 million cubic metres), the Centre de l'Aube, is in the Champagne district, a former one is among Normandy farms, and the Drigg site is in UK in a scenic part of Cumbria, albeit not far from the Sellafield industrial complex.
Long-lived intermediate-level waste requires a higher degree of isolation from the biosphere and it is put into engineered geological repositories, or held in surface storage pending the development of such repositories.
High-level wastes (HLW), typically the used fuel from power reactors or the wastes left over from reprocessing this used fuel, contain most of the radioactivity from the nuclear fuel cycle. They generate heat due to the high radioactivity and require cooling as well as shielding. (Australia does not have any high-level waste. Its spent fuel from the research reactor* – if waste, would be defined as 'intermediate-level', and the waste which results from reprocessing it abroad will be returned as long-lived ILW for disposal or storage.)
Any radioactive wastes which require it will be stabilised and solidified. Only those wastes in solid, stable form and devoid of corrosive or reactive materials will be accepted at the repository or store.
|Toxic waste disposal
Other toxic wastes in Australia are either sent to licensed disposal sites or held in storage. Many of these, such as chromium wastes, copper-chrome-arsenic, mercury compounds, PCBs, organochlorines and hexachlorobenzene are extremely hazardous, many are liquids. Radioactive wastes are treated much more conservatively than other toxic wastes in relation to risks to people and the environment. Most of these other toxic wastes do not break down naturally in a way which corresponds to the progressive decay of radioactivity. Many have actually had significant health and environmental effects.
In countries with nuclear power, civil radioactive wastes comprise about 1% of overall toxic wastes. In Australia that proportion is very much less.
Low-level and short-lived intermediate level wastes will be disposed of in a shallow, engineered repository designed to ensure that radioactive material is contained and allowed to decay safely to background levels. Dry conditions will allow a simpler structure than some overseas repositories. The material will be buried in drums or contained in concrete. The repository will have a secure multi-layer cover at least 5 metres thick, so that it does not add to local background radiation levels at the site.
Over half of the present 400+ m3 of LLW is lightly-contaminated soil from CSIRO mineral processing research over 40 years ago (and could conceivably be reclassified, since it is no more radioactive than many natural rocks and sands). Annual arisings are small (the 40 cubic metres would be three truckloads).
Long-lived intermediate-level (category S) wastes will be stored above ground in an engineered facility designed to hold them secure for an extended period and to shield their radiation until a geological repository is eventually justified and established, or alternative arrangements made.
There is about 650 cubic metres of category S waste at various locations awaiting disposal, and future annual arisings will be about five cubic metres from all sources including states & territories, Commonwealth agencies and from radiopharmaceutical production. To this will be added about 30 m3 of returned wastes from reprocessing spent ANSTO research reactor fuel in Europe. This will be conditioned by vitrification or embedding in cement.
Eight shipments of used fuel from ANSTO’s research reactors have been sent overseas between 1996 and 2009 – four to France, three to the USA and one to the UK. The French ones were for reprocessing, and the vitrified intermediate-level wastes from that were required under French law to be repatriated by the end of 2015. This was completed safely and successfully. Following arrival by nuclear-rated ship at Port Kembla, 25 tonnes of vitrified waste was transported under the supervision of state and federal authorities to ANSTO’s Lucas Heights campus. There it is being stored in a purpose-built facility until a national waste repository is sited and built by the federal government. Wastes from reprocessing in the UK will be repatriated later. Used fuel sent to the USA will be retained and disposed of there, in line with US policy.
Australian plans – siting
In 1992, with the full cooperation of all state and territory governments, the Commonwealth government initiated an Australia-wide survey to site a low level waste repository. In May 2003 a final site for the national repository near Woomera in South Australia was decided. The disposal area of the repository would be about 100 metres square, with long trenches up to 20 metres deep. It would be set in a 2.25 square kilometre buffer zone.
In 2001 the government decided to locate the ILW store on the same site as the LLW repository. For this, a secure building with concrete vaults for the category S wastes would occupy a similar area at Woomera.
But in mid-2004, bowing to state-level political implications, the Australian government abandoned these plans and told the states each to set up their own, to international standards. This failure in cooperation appeared to conclude twelve years of thorough bipartisan progress to locate and licence a single national facility. "All states and territories accepted the need for the safe and secure disposal, in one place, of low-level waste. But no-one wants it in their backyard." The Commonwealth government, owner of most existing low-level waste (then totalling about 3700 cubic metres) and virtually all the ILW, started to look for a new site on commonwealth land to take only its wastes.
Northern Territory plans
In July 2005 the government announced that a new Commonwealth Radioactive Waste Management Facility would be located at one of three sites in the Northern Territory, selection to be based on "field assessment", followed by environmental assessment and licensing. This would involve co-located ILW store and LLW repository, and the Commonwealth Radioactive Waste Management Act 2005 was passed. In the light of "the failure of the states and territories to cooperate with the Australian government in finding a national solution for the safe and secure disposal of low-level radioactive waste" and their making a political football out of it in 2004, they would need to make their own arrangements elsewhere.
In May 2007 the Northern Land Council (NLC), an elected Aboriginal body in the Northern Territory, with the Ngapa clan who are the traditional owners, nominated the Muckaty pastoral holding as a potential site for the national radioactive waste facility. If the site is suitable the traditional owners would sign over 1.5 square kilometres for a long lease and receive A$ 12 million in benefits. In September 2007 the government accepted this nomination and Muckaty was assessed along with Harts Range, Mount Everard and Fishers Ridge as potential sites for a low-level waste repository and an intermediate-level waste store, then planned to open in 2011. However, a change of federal government derailed plans and the issue again became a political football.
In April 2012 a new National Radioactive Waste Management Act came into effect, establishing a slightly different legislative framework for siting a facility for both ILW and LLW on volunteered land. It applies to all Australian radioactive wastes, not simply those which are the direct responsibility of the commonwealth government. The 2005 Act was repealed. Once a preferred site is selected, a two-year environmental assessment process would begin, in conjunction with the site licensing process.
The Muckaty, NT site remained under consideration, but some of the traditional owners dissented and launched legal action to again derail the process. The NLC then withdrew the application in June 2014 due to “divisions within the aboriginal community” exacerbated by “outside pressures”.
New call for site nominations
Following the Muckaty withdrawal and arising directly from it, in March 2015 the federal government called for nominations by 5 May of sites from any landholder “to store Australia’s intermediate-level radioactive waste and dispose of low-level waste.” An independent advisory panel would assess the nominated sites against a number of "criteria and objectives including community well-being, stable environment, environmental protection, health, safety and security and economic viability," after which, and following public consultation, the government "intends to negotiate with the landholder of the selected site... The government will also engage with the community in closest proximity to the selected site and will discuss a package of benefits in recognition of the potential construction and operational requirements of the facility.”
In response, 28 sites were nominated by landholders and by November 2015 these had been reduced to a shortlist of six, in three states and NT. After public consultation in each area, involving Geoscience Australia and ANSTO, a provisional selection was made in April 2016, of Barnidoota, in the northern Flinders Ranges of South Australia. The new 'storage facility', requiring an area of about 100 ha, is expected to be ready by 2021. When the site is confirmed following further negotiation, the owners of the land will sell to the Commonwealth on generous terms and the local community will receive about $10 million for projects.
Transport to any site will be regulated according to the relevant code of practice, but the low-level wastes will require little in the way of special provisions. The long-lived intermediate-level wastes will be very securely packaged. Low-level and short-lived intermediate level materials are transported in Australia every day and are considered less hazardous than flammable and toxic liquids such as petrol.
South Australian Royal Commission
In February 2015 the South Australian government announced a royal commission on nuclear power and related matters. Its draft terms of reference include inquiring and reporting on “the feasibility of establishing facilities in South Australia for the management, storage and disposal of nuclear and radioactive waste from the use of nuclear and radioactive materials in power generation, industry, research and medicine (but not for, or from, military uses), any circumstances necessary for those facilities to be established and to be viable, the risks and opportunities associated with establishing and operating those facilities, and any measures that might need to be taken to facilitate and regulate their establishment and operation.”
The Royal Commission’s recommendations did not address the national repository and store plans, but did include a recommendation to pursue the opportunity to establish used nuclear fuel and intermediate-level waste storage and disposal facilities in South Australia. This is discussed in the information paper on International Nuclear Waste Disposal Concepts.
Australian government, 1998, Information kit Our Radioactive Waste,
Australian government, June 1999, Report on public comment, phase 3 site selection study,
Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Radioactive waste management in Australia and www.radioactivewaste.gov.au
National Radioactive Waste Management Act 2012
IAEA, Managing radioactive waste,
OECD NEA 1996, Radioactive waste management in perspective
ANSTO, 2011, Management of Radioactive Wastes in Australia