|
Table 4: Innovative technologies related to nuclear fuel cycle.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Attribute |
Process & system |
Relevant countries |
Features |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
Fuel composition & process |
Pyro-process |
Japan, Russia, USA |
Nuclear waste volume is smaller and process facility is simpler than those of wet process (expected economic and environmental advantages). |
|||
|
|
Vibro-packed fuel |
Russia, Switzerland |
Fuel particle is directly produced from acid solution from reprocessing (economic merit is expected compared to powder technology). |
|||
|
|
DUPIC system |
Canada, Rep. of Korea |
Plutonium is not separated from PWR spent fuel (proliferation resistance is expected). |
|||
|
|
Thorium fuel (Th–U, Th–Pu) |
India, USA |
Th resource is abundant. Fuel with Th–233U composition generates less MA than U–Pu fuel. |
|||
|
|
Inert-matrix fuel |
France, Japan, Switzerland |
Due to chemically stable oxide, spent fuel is regarded as waste form (environmental mitigation). |
|||
|
Partitioning and Transmutation (P–T) system |
Accelerator Driven System |
France, Japan, USA |
High neutron energy produced in accelerator destroys MA, LLFP. Sub-critical core enhances safety. |
|||
|
|
P–T system with fast reactor (FR) |
Japan, Russia |
Existing FR technology is applied for destruction of MA, LLFP. |
|||
|
Fast reactor and fuel cycle system |
Pb (+Bi) FR |
Russia |
Enhanced resource utilisation, proliferation resistance, safety and waste features. |
|||
|
|
||||||
© copyright The Uranium Institute 2000