Table 4: Innovative technologies related to nuclear fuel cycle.

Attribute

 

Process & system

 

Relevant countries

 

Features


Fuel composition & process

 

Pyro-process

 

Japan, Russia, USA

 

Nuclear waste volume is smaller and process facility is simpler than those of wet process (expected economic and environmental advantages).

 

Vibro-packed fuel

 

Russia, Switzerland

 

Fuel particle is directly produced from acid solution from reprocessing (economic merit is expected compared to powder technology).

 

DUPIC system

 

Canada, Rep. of Korea

 

Plutonium is not separated from PWR spent fuel (proliferation resistance is expected).

 

Thorium fuel (Th–U, Th–Pu)

 

India, USA

 

Th resource is abundant. Fuel with Th–233U composition generates less MA than U–Pu fuel.

 

Inert-matrix fuel

 

France, Japan, Switzerland

 

Due to chemically stable oxide, spent fuel is regarded as waste form (environmental mitigation).

Partitioning and Transmutation (P–T) system

 

Accelerator Driven System

 

France, Japan, USA

 

High neutron energy produced in accelerator destroys MA, LLFP. Sub-critical core enhances safety.

 

P–T system with fast reactor (FR)

 

Japan, Russia

 

Existing FR technology is applied for destruction of MA, LLFP.

Fast reactor and fuel cycle system

 

Pb (+Bi) FR

 

Russia

 

Enhanced resource utilisation, proliferation resistance, safety and waste features.


The Need for Innovative Nuclear Reactor and Fuel Cycle Systems

Restore Frames
  |  Sym Home  |  Programme  |  Back   |  Forward

© copyright The Uranium Institute 2000